CPD audit statistics for the 2019-2021 renewal cycle
A total of 143 clinical scientists were asked to present their CPD profile.
|
Outcome |
|
No. of registrants audited |
|
Percentage of sample |
|
Accepted |
|
120 |
|
83.9% |
|
Deferred |
|
16 |
|
11.2% |
|
Did not renew |
|
6 |
|
4.2% |
|
Voluntary Deregistration |
|
1 |
|
0.7% |
|
Removed |
|
0 |
|
0% |
|
Still awaiting |
|
0 |
|
0% |
|
Total |
|
143 |
|
100% |
Outcome explanation key
We categorised each registrant audited into one of six different outcomes. An explanation of these outcomes is given below.
|
Accepted |
|
The CPD profile met the CPD standards. |
|
Deferred |
|
The registrant was selected for audit but requested deferral due to unavoidable circumstances, and we accepted their request. |
|
Did not renew |
|
The registrant was removed from the Register because they did not renew their registration. |
|
Voluntarily deregistered |
|
The registrant was selected for audit but removed their name from the Register and so did not participate in the audit. |
|
Removed |
|
The registrant was removed from the Register because they did not meet the CPD standards. |
|
Still awaiting |
|
The registrant's CPD profile is currently being assessed. |
- Published:
- 08/12/2021
- Resources
- Data
- Subcategory:
- CPD audit data
- Profession
- Clinical scientists